Archive | Progressive Fascism RSS for this section

Thoughts on the Self-Immolation of Rev. Charles R. Moore

http://www.umc.org/news-and-media/retired-pastor-saw-destiny-in-self-immolation

Reverend sets himself on fire for the cause of social justice. One less wacko.

It disgusts me that we live in society where such moral confusion is embraced as a compassionate act. 

This is an act of true intolerance and materialist greed. The prior comment regarding the need for control is profound in this man’s covetous desire to balance his view of justice to the world. Where have we seen this before in history? Let us count the materialist ways…since Jean Jacques Rousseau..that this materialist Hell can foment.

The very use of the term ‘social justice’ implies an ideology wrought with hatred for individual liberty, yet he fancies himself an advocate of minorities and homosexuals? Really, freaking, really? This man clearly allowed his politics to form his faith rather than his faith form his politics.

I am a profound admirer of Dietrich Bonhoeffer, and if I may borrow a jab… this man is no Dietrich Bonhoeffer!

The 9/11 hijackers also set themselves on fire for views in which they felt justified. Is there a difference in the fact that he did not shoot up a shopping mall for the cause of “social justice”.

This is violence!

A Brief History of Socialist Plots to End the American Way of Life

clipped from www.commondreams.org

Don’t you just love Leftist revisionism, propaganda, logic, and art?
Public Schools – Disaster, partisan cronyism and money pit. Compare to private schools.

Public Water System – Compared to what? Private water system?

Public highways – Yes, that really has a lot to do with socialism. LOL

Public Parks, introduced by a Progressive Republican and supported by Republicans, this is actually the Fed overstepping it’s reach to control the property of sovereign states. States operate their parks with much greater efficiency than the Federal Gov’t.

Just because you want to pretend the inferiority of progressive ideas is superior doesn’t mean it matches reality.

Of course, we could get into other Progressive or materialist policies and debate the results of them.

Slavery – We know how that ended.

Segregation – How wonderful was that?

Abortion/Planned Parenthood, founded to cull society of the undesirables. Today blacks are being decimated by abortion. Revolution of society vs Evolution of society. 2 sides of the same coin.

The Federal Reserve/Central Bank – Oh yes, we are all loving that crony capitalism.

League of Nations/United Nations. – That just works out so well. And the Left wonders how we get so tied up in the issues of other nations. Thank you Woodrow Wilson. We all relish John Dewey and Woodrow Wilson for illuminating the “social possibilities of war”.

Ahh, yes, and Roosevelt’s Blue Eagle Campaign, which authorized a dictatorship over businesses in America. Too bad that pesky Supreme Court overturned that and enabled the free market economy to turn around and lift us out of the Great Depression Long after all other nations had begun to grow their economies.

Shall we continue?

To the Left “Reason is a tool of Oppresion” – Derrida.

The Tytler Cycle of Society

clipped from www.commonsensegovernment.com

  • From bondage to spiritual faith;
  • From spiritual faith to great courage;
  • From courage to liberty;
  • From liberty to abundance;
  • From abundance to complacency;
  • From complacency to apathy;
  • From apathy to dependence;
  • From dependence back into bondage

  • From bondage to spiritual faith (1760 to 1769)
    From spiritual faith to great courage (1770 to 1783)
    From courage to liberty (1784 to 1865)
    From liberty to abundance (1866 to 1969)
    From abundance to complacency (1970 to 1989)
    From complacency to apathy (1990 to 2000)
    From apathy to dependence (2001 to 2007)
    From dependence back into bondage (2008 to ????)

    Fascsim

    Communism and Fascism: Both are totalitarian
    American Right is libertarian: Anti-totalitarian

    Fascism is a government focused, statist society
    American Right supports individual sovereignty and liberty.

    Fascism/Socialism have cultivated war-socialism, state control of media, and compulsory service to the state.
    American Right traditionally cultivates a resistance to meddle in the affairs of other nations.

    Fascism/Socialism pushes for nationalist or protectionist strategies.
    Libertarianism/Right pushes for free trade.

    Fascism/Socialist/Progressivism is a top to bottom system of power.( Federal>state>local>individual)
    Libertarianism is a bottom up system of power ( individual>local>state>Federal)

    Fascism/Communism/Progressivism foster societal mobilization, organic unity.
    Libertarianism fosters free will, thousand points of light, the fractally-complex richness of society.

    Fascism/Progressives/Communists are controllers, materialists, intolerant.
    Libertarians, American Rightist Conservatives are believers in individuals and communities.

    Senate Bill Defines All Water as Belonging to Federal Government

    Mudflats near Oban on Stewart Island, New Zealand.
    Image via Wikipedia
    Really? Unbelievable!
    clipped from thomas.loc.gov

      (8) this Act will treat, as `waters of the United States’, those features that were treated as such pursuant to the regulations of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Corps of Engineers in existence before the dates of the decisions referred to in paragraph (10), including–

      (A) all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide;

      (B) all interstate waters, including interstate wetlands;

      (C) all other waters, such as intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds;

      (D) all impoundments of waters of the United States;

      (E) tributaries of the aforementioned waters;

      (F) the territorial seas; and

      (G) wetlands adjacent to the aforementioned waters;
      blog it
    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

    Back Door Censorship

    The Frankfurt School was dedicated to the destruction of the West. One of its founders, Willi Munzenberg, stated explicitly that its goal was to:
    …organise the intellectuals and use them to make Western civilisation stink [sic]. Only then, after they have corrupted all its values and made life impossible, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariat.
    According to an article by Timothy Matthews in Catholic Insight, key strategies to achieve this goal were:
    1. The creation of racism offences.
    2. Continual change to create confusion.
    3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children.
    4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority.
    5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
    6. The promotion of excessive drinking.
    7. Emptying of churches.
    8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime.
    9. Dependency on the state or state benefits.
    10. Control and dumbing down of media.
    11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family.
    Munzenberg stated
    clipped from www.americanthinker.com
    Hate crimes legislation has its roots in the communist-inspired, so-called Frankfurt School founded in Frankfurt, Germany by Bolsheviks in the 1920s. Its goal was to implement communism in the West quietly by gradually subverting popular culture — a movement known as Cultural Marxism. One of its leading lights, Herbert Marcuse, opined that the prevailing Western social order is repressive by definition and discriminates against minorities simply by existing.
    This creates a phenomenon he called “repressive tolerance
    Instead, he proposed what he called “partisan tolerance

    ,” i.e. tolerating the views of those “repressed minorities” only — who Marcuse assumes share his partisan hatred for everything noncommunist — while actively muzzling the views of the majority.

    They have been practicing “partisan tolerance.” That is, tolerance of the extreme Left and virulent intolerance of anything else.

    Peter Singer’s case for the vile Progressive Road

    clipped from str.typepad.com
    Singer writes, “My colleague Helga Kuhse and I suggest that a period of 28 days after birth might be allowed before an infant is accepted as having the same right to life as others.” Singer argues that even pigs, chickens, and fish have more signs of consciousness and rationality—and, consequently, a greater claim to rights—than do fetuses, newborn infants, and people with mental disabilities. “Rats are indisputably more aware of their surroundings, and more able to respond in purposeful and complex ways to things they like or dislike, than a fetus at 10- or even 32-weeks gestation. … The calf, the pig, and the much-derided chicken come out well ahead of the fetus at any stage of pregnancy.”
    blog it

    The Seminal Point for Materialist Progressivism

    clipped from str.typepad.com
    With savages [i.e., those in more primitive societies], the weak in body or mind are soon eliminated; and those that survive commonly exhibit a vigorous state of health…. We civilized men, on the other hand, do our utmost to check the process of elimination; we build asylums for the imbecile, the maimed, and the sick; we institute poor-laws; and our medical men exert their utmost skill to save the life of every one to the last moment.  There is reason to believe that vaccination has preserved thousands, who from a weak constitution would formerly have succumbed to small-pox.  Thus the weak members of civilized societies propagate their kind.  No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man. 
    excepting in the case of man himself, hardly any one is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals to breed….
      blog it
    “If…various checks…do not prevent the reckless, the vicious and otherwise inferior members of society from increasing at a quicker rate than the better class of men, the nation will retrograde, as has occurred too often in the history of the world. We must remember that progress is no invariable rule….”